Custom Search


This blog is also available in the following languages

Sunday, 16 August 2009

I bought Super Coffeemix Manufacturing Ltd AGAIN on 13th August 2009

Rationale

Super Coffeemix just announced its 2Q 2009 results which I deemed as encouraging (though not as superb without its fair value adjustments on its investment securities).

Performance over the last several quarters

The table below summarises its quarter performance:

A few things to note:
  1. Operating profit seems to bottom out in 4Q 2008.
  2. Ignoring fair value adjustments of its investment securities, net profit seems to bottom out only in 1Q 2009.
  3. Revenue also seems to bottom out in 1Q 2009.
Conclusion

It remains to be seen whether improvements in 2Q 2009 is sustainable but looking the general numbers, its performance does seems encouraging enough (to me) to re-enter into Super Coffeemix... again.

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

I trimmed my holdings on Super Coffeemix on 20th May 2008

Review on 1Q 2008 results

At first glance, Super Coffeemix's profit dropped about 27%. On closer look, removing other income or loss (mainly due to equity investments), net profit actually rose 33.5% from 7,543m SGD in 1Q '07 to 10.072m SGD in 1Q '08.

However, equity investment is a regular activity for Super Coffeemix, hence I can't ignore them this way. This only means their core operations is still doing pretty well and would have been better if they don't deal with the equity investments altogether.

Looking at the cash flow statement, at least cash flow from operations is still pretty strong.

Thus I can say the results are pretty encouraging, at least their core operations are still holding up in the midst of intense competition, pressure from runaway raw material cost and other operating expenses.

Rationale for trimming my holdings

While the results clearly showed good performance, I'm pretty skeptical these justify the current market valuation. To say its overvalued is just an understatement. However, my experience with Armarda and Golden Agri-Resources taught me not to underestimate the power of irrational market exuberance. So long as the market rumour on possible takeover is not formally clarified, I won't know what price it will aim for... and I'm not taking chances with my capital.

Thus, with today's run-up in prices, I'm happy to disposed about halve of my holdings at $1.15 a share, a neat gain of 78.3%, and almost covering my principal.

Labels: , ,

Sunday, 6 April 2008

I bought Super Coffeemix on 3rd April 2008

Rationale

I had already compared Super Coffeemix with Food Empire & Tsit Wing in an earlier post. I valued Super Coffeemix to be around 72 cents while it was trading above 90 cents then. That was 26th June 2007. Today, fundamentals had clearly improved for Super Coffeemix, yet the market actually gave a discount even below the outdated 72 cents. This is yet another proof that equity is commonly mispriced by the market, i.e. overpricing in market exuberance and underpricing in pessimism.

Plus - Keeping cost low but is it possible?

On 15th January 2007, Super Coffeemix announced that it had signed a MOU with HLH Group, formerly PDC Corp to grow and supply coffee beans for the former at a discount. The following is quoted directly from the annoucement:

Under the MOU, PDC will cultivate and grow coffee plants on parts of its Indonesian plantations suitable for cultivation and production of coffee beans. Super Coffeemix will purchase all such coffee beans produced by PDC at a discount to the then prevailing international commodities market.

If they are able to keep the cost of raw materials down, they will enjoy a comparative advantage over other coffee companies. However, its still too early to tell whether this venture had succeeded.

Minus - Rather aggressive growth plans

New subsidiaries, Acquisitions and other Investments since 2007
  1. March 2007 - JV Co
  2. March 2007- Investment in Tianjin Super Lifestyle Food Development Company
  3. April 2007 - Super Malikha Pte Ltd (“SMPL”) in PRC
  4. July 2007 - Acquisition of 6.84% of PSC Corp
Increase in investment
  1. March 2007- Increase in investment in JHS Holdings
  2. May 2007- Increase in investment in Super Coffeemix Marketing Sdn Bhd
  3. July 2007- Increase in investment in Tianjin Super Lifestyle Food Development Company
  4. Nov 2007- Increase in investment in Wuxi VV Super Coffee Co. Ltd
Quasi-equity loans
  1. August 2007- Quasi-equity loan to Sun Resources
  2. November 2007- More quasi-equity loan to Sun Resources
  3. March 2008- Quasi-equity loan to JHS Holdings
While investments might be good be for the company, the aggressive nature in the way Super Coffeemix pursue them might be a cause of concern. This is because the quality of returns (i.e. return on equity) might be sacrificed just to achieve growth. Another cause of concern is the amount of quasi-equity loans to its subsidiaries. These amounts to more than $ 10M SGD to date collectively.

Conclusion

To date, I had acquired 3 out of 4 companies listed on SGX with business involving coffee and other common daily instant food & beverages. Geographically, my holdings had exposure to Russia, Ukraine, Central Asia, China and Southeast Asia. The company I missed out is Viz Brand. In terms of market, it had duplication with Super Coffeemix and I would think it had a much stronger brand than Viz Brand.

Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, 27 June 2007

Comparing Super Coffeemix, Food Empire and Tsit Wing on 26th June 2007

My love for coffee spurred my interest in coffee counters. Hence I decided to compare and contrast the three listed in SGX. Though I buy into companies on individual merit, regardless of sectors they operate in, my portfolio coincidentally hold 2 out of the 3 counters.

Overview

1) Food Empire operates primarily in Russia, Ukraine, Central Asia and Eastern Europe. Its main brands are MacCoffee, Klassno, FesAroma, Bésame, OrienBites, MacCandy, Zinties and Kracks.

2) Super Coffeemix operates primarily in Singapore, other parts of Southeast Asia and China. Its main brands are Super, Owl and Nova.

3) Tsit Wing operates primarily in Hong Kong and a lesser extent in China and Canada. Its main business is actually distribution of coffee and tea products to restaurants and hotels.

Business comparison


Figure 1 - Revenue from 2003 to 2006

It is clear from 2003 that Tsit Wing was running far behind Super Coffeemix and Food Empire in terms of sale. Tsit Wing had closed to 80% of market share in Hong Kong and due to limited expansion success overseas (esp. China), their sale basically stagnated across the years. Super Coffeemix expanded well in Southeast Asia and to a limited extent, China. The growth in Southeast Asia (incl. Singapore) already improved sales by a large margin. Food Empire seemed to have even a better success in Russia, Ukraine, Central Asia and parts of Eastern Europe. It's sale was a little behind Super Coffeemix in 2003 but caught up quite significantly by 2006.

Profitability



Figure 2- Profit Margin from 2003 to 2006

Coffee distribution business is a very competitive business. Competitive business environment without perceivable barriers to entry will ultimately drive down profits to zero for all players. As can be seen from the chart above, Tsit Wing was enjoying high profit margin but competition erodes the margin significantly. Super Coffeemix, profit margin after is no better off after 2005. In stark contrast, Food Empire's profit margin, though showing signs of erosion, kept above 10%.



Figure 3- Earnings per share from 2003 to 2006

Comparing earnings per share, it is clear Food Empire is a runaway success.


Figure 4- Return on equity from 2004 to 2006

Comparing return on equity, unsurprisingly, Food Empire lead the pack. However, Tsit Wing earned better returns on equity than Super Coffeemix.

Comparing the numbers


Food Empire

Super Coffeemix

Tsit Wing

Revenue (Sale)

234,124

210,690

64,341

Cost of goods sold

117,509

135,161

36,827

Selling & distribution expense

56,746

27,211

10,886

General & administrative expense

23,904

24,440

8,520

Other expense

5,041

898

205





Efficiency




Cost of goods sold to sales

50.19%

64.15%

57.24%

Selling & distribution expense to sales

24.24%

12.92%

16.92%

General & administrative expense to sales

20.34%

18.08%

23.14%

Other expense to sales

2.15%

0.43%

0.32%





Profitability




Net income (excl. non-operating income)

26,319

17,159

6,874

Profit Margin (after tax)

11.24%

8.14%

10.68%

Return on Assets, ROA

17.08%

6.34%

13.02%

Return on Equity, ROE (incl. minority interest)

21.70%

9.17%

15.25%





Earnings per share, EPS




Earnings per share (Cents)

6.42

3.48

3.56





Valuation (As at 26 June 2007)




Historical P/E

20.47

22.43

7.31

Intrinsic Value (SGD)

1.04

0.72

0.30


Table 1 - Business performance across the 3 companies

Comparing their price

From the above figures, it is without doubt that the better performer is Food Empire. The only company amongst the 3 that can maintain a high, double digit ROE, a relatively high, double digit profit margin and yet speculator sales growth is Food Empire. Hence it is not surprising to note that's share price is traded at $1.05, above $0.97 and $0.28 for Super Coffeemix and Tsit Wing respectively.

One interesting fact to note is that the market valued Food Empire and Super Coffeemix relatively the same (97 cents is not that far off $1.05). However, Tsit Wing's ROE, ROA, profit margin and EPS was so much better than Super Coffeemix, yet Tsit Wing traded at only less than 30% of Super Coffeemix's share price.

One possibility was that the market might have anticipated a speculator growth in profitability of Super Coffeemix to justify current price valution. Hence, assume that Super Coffeemix is fairly valued, is there a possibility that Tsit Wing is actually unvalued, given its strong performance indicator? That its trading at such price because it is largely ignored, under researched, compared to Super Coffeemix?

Valuation

I decided to investigate for myself. Taking into consideration their current business prospects and factoring anticipated future earnings, I estimated their intrinsic value using the Residual Income Model. Using a Expected Rate of Return of 10%, I found that Food Empire and Tsit Wing was actually trading at fair value while Super Coffeemix was trading above its intrinsic value. Maybe I underestimated the potential earnings growth of Super Coffeemix.

Labels: , , , , ,